Stop the sexism of the anti-smoking!
Christoph Lövenich criticized by the network smoking misogyny WHO
The network of smoking calls for "World No Tobacco Day 'Stop the sexism of the anti-smoking! It criticizes the activities of the WHO "World No Tobacco Day" as a misogynist. The international campaign dedicated to this year, the gender issue and leads a pink logo that says "smoking is ugly." Female tobacco consumption should be controlled by the will of the World Health Organization special.
"Anti-smoking women still want to concede less than men," said Christoph Lövenich network of smoking, "they want to oppress women, smoking has always been more than male smokers." This is true for centuries, and in Germany, the tobacco control in the Third Reich speak volumes: women under Hitler were removed tobacco rations, some of them were expelled for smoking in public organizations. Elsewhere in the world we still find that societies in which the use of tobacco by women is particularly frowned upon.
Lövenich: "The anti-smokers are gender politics never come out of the Middle Ages." The Nazis had generally supposed dangers of smoking during pregnancy to serve as propaganda, as was the WHO's Tobacco Control at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), not with his current arguments continue . The Heidelberg facility accuses the network of smoke that mark the "World Non smoking day" is also false claims about the alleged harmful effects of tobacco smoke in the area of children's Spread.
Purpose of the "network Smoking" is zuwachen by appropriate measures the fact that basic values such as the right to human dignity, the self-determination of one's lifestyle and the freedom of action is not questionable policy, especially health policy objectives and methods to be sacrificed. Network smoking is an organization that supports human rights and - in particular but not exclusively - to drink eat a representation of those who smoke expect their lives to freedom, and make general decisions of personal life without Restriktionenc and state interference to .
The network wants to smoke in particular ensure that the handling of tobacco smoke in the light of correct, factual and credible information is - and ensure that health claims from the macro is no discrimination and vilification of smokers grows.
Popularity: 4% [ ? ]
Related posts:
These products may also be interested in:
- No association between smoking bans and heart attacks less the heart attack rates have been falling for years, in the meantime introduced smoking bans have no influence, the network is smoking in a recent survey ...
- Non-swimmers need protection, not Non smoking Non-swimmers can float in pools of swimming pools are killed, Non smoking in rooms where people smoke, do not. That is why the ...
- Constitutional Court must consider secondhand smoke , the Constitutional Court is put in the review of the statutory smoking ban a particular focus on the alleged health hazards of secondhand smoke ....
- Price for network Smoking Smoking The network was awarded last Tuesday in Cologne with a special prize from the tip, the tobacco-innovation award. This is the price ...
- Worldwide organization founded for freedom organizations from many countries who oppose the increasing state interference in the private life of the people who have at last ...
- U.S. media publish destinations for smokers in the U.S., the birthplace of Prohibition, it seems there is a need to rule on smoking-friendly holiday destinations. Only then is it to ...
- "Pandemic" is word of the year whether swine flu or tobacco "pandemic," WHO (World Health Organization) shall, in the interests of public health lobby and the pharmaceutical companies for making new absurd panic ...
If you consider that today, "Secondhand smoke is harmful," all these third-kingdom-parables such as Fritz Lickint which operated successfully in those times, did not become fashionable again questioned udg surprise me in the direction of anything.
I hope and wish is that this ill-fated Third Reich is not a Fourth Reich under different conditions, but rises with the same ideology. The people seem to be manipulated, like the old days - and these supposed feminists seem not even realize that they correspond exactly to the so-called 'brave new world' of the patriarchal ideal, which they planned to fight. For a long time, my sympathy for these so-called hold 'Erdbefreierinnen' to grant the concessions to today's society, not only men, but almost celebrate, within limits. Were 'beaten.' Not enough
My challenge this eco-fascist ideas of the Greens and the brown ÖDP you be certain.
Grüßlis, by Muna :)