Exposed again DKFZ lies
The DKFZ , German Cancer Research Institute in Heidelberg, has squandered his final seriousness. Again it was shown that the DKFZ consciously or wrong data or important information can be reflecting off the table.
The company Rudolf Gutmann from the Swabian Mühlacker produces under the name "CASADRON" air cleaning devices. These devices were tested both in their own long-term studies as well as the TÜV Rheinland to a thorough review be made available.
The results are interesting facts, like the Swabian peasant ventilation in a press release pointed out. Following completion and evaluation of the examination of over 200 harmful components found that by cleaning the air with CASADRON air cleaner pollutants including tobacco smoke far below the detection limit and well below the target levels of VOC's (recommendation in accordance with the Working Group AOLG, AUH, Supreme Court and International Red Cross, Target and benchmarks to evaluate the VOC concentrations in indoor air) could be accommodated.
According to this working group are at levels below the guideline value even under permanent exposure to harm to human health to be expected. Hence it is proved that a technical Non smoking protection is provided with technically excellent and proven air cleaners, and according to the manufacturer after a smoking ban would not be very compelling.
Literally wrote the Gutmann: "The claim and release by the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) in Heidelberg, ventilation and air filtration systems would not provide sufficient protection and the public testimony of Dr. Martina Pötschke - Langer, ventilation and air filtration systems were a fairy tale and labeling, We have therefore decided to return.
Furthermore, by claiming dkfz, for example, that in a private home, is not smoked in, 3μg / m³ benzene pollution was normal. In contrast, benzene is classified as the dkfz but highly carcinogenic.
The assertion of the DKFZ, that even a tornado, the pollutants that have accumulated on the premises, can not remove is irrelevant. We have demonstrated by a 3-year study that good industrial ventilation systems and air cleaners do not cause deposits on the walls, interior or on the clothes of the guests.
Been a major part of the investigations by the DKFZ is either already obsolete or refuted by reputable scientists. This information will not be published.
Either, the Cancer Research Center is not sufficiently informed about the technical possibilities for clean air in indoor spaces are available, or they were simply ignored by their own interests, a ban on smoking at the politicians and the public to enforce.
Furthermore, in the publication series listed dkfz that, when not smoked, a healthy environment would exist. Through this statement the politicians and the population is suggested that there is a smoking ban only healthy air. Which is by far not the case. There are still pollutants and carcinogens present in very high concentrations, which can often cause more disease than tobacco smoke.
For further details in the publication series is dkfz claimed that only arbitrarily evaluated components of tobacco smoke have been measured. We also have to strongly disagree.
From another by us to the study commissioned TÜV Rheinland - What is actually there in tobacco smoke? - We have in the meantime before the first standard reports and have to date only a few components are classified as cancer-causing. More sophisticated studies will follow and it will show how much carcinogenic and mutagenic substances are actually present in tobacco smoke today.
We can not understand and comprehend not how an institution like the DKFZ, is that a high reputation among the population held in his red serials, an entire industry ventilation Bauer, air filtration systems, technical air pollution control innovations and outstanding engineering services and a number of worldwide patents pending and issued in this area, so defamed and exercise on the policy a major negative impact. "
Popularity: 3% [ ? ]
Related posts:
These products may also be interested in:
- Sales in the catering trade collapsed - lying DKFZ? It is clear from the publications of the national statistical offices and the Federal Statistical Office, the turnover in the restaurant use ...




































Waiting for Long-Pötschke
Comment by Wolfgang Weege written at: 15.05.2008, 22:16:56 Clock
Refutation refuted
The statements by the DKFZ are not wrong, in a debate would the makers of
Comment Review: Do not like me or me:
How can one be so naive?
The DKFZ proven liar. Find some of the search engine of your choice for "second-hand smoke lie." Even the dumbest anti-smoking should be seen as very DKFZ and lie to their delusions of WHO tobacco-free world to push through.
again:
The German Cancer Research Center does not need to lie.
They're not stupid enough to gamble away their credibility.
You are so blinded - must be the most addictive.
Comment Review: Do not like me or me:
Lobbyist or TÜV believe?
Should an anti-tobacco lobbyist is heavily dependent on the pharmaceutical lobby and feel the TUV? So I think the TUV.
And that the DKFZ is lying, so now is not really new nor special. This is standard.
Comment Review: Do not like me or me:
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see .
Was to be expected
Mrs. Pötschke-liar leads a religious war, and there are all the means allowed -. And she turns to good for her cause we let them and the study by Gutmann spread to all members!. The
get more and more lately
come to think and when they
not attach the same faith as MPL, they are the law NRSch ..
bring in a reasonable form.
The BmB (federal responsible citizen) will
do its dissemination of the report.
Michael Weber